Dec 28, 2011

Teaching vocabulary out of context: is it worth the time?


Those of you who have been to my workshops or read my articles on TeachingEnglish are perhaps surprised why someone who advocates teaching vocabulary in chunks would even pose a question like this. However, several research papers I read a few years ago while doing my Master's in TESOL made me rethink the issue of contextualisation and try out new things. Besides, as you will see in a moment, learning  words in chunks and learning vocabulary in context are not the same things.



In and out of context 

Traditionally, in the first lesson of the New Year I discuss with my students the main events and news stories of the past year - a news roundup of some sort. This normally involves a quiz which I prepare based on various news items: politics, entertainment, sports, disasters as well as some quirky news stories - (see the 2011 one here). The questions in the quiz are not aimed so much at testing students’ general knowledge, but rather stimulating discussions, encouraging them to look up information on the web and focusing on vocabulary - I make sure that the quiz is lexically rich.
        
While discussing the news stories we focus on useful lexical items as they come up. For example (taken from last year’s news quiz)
Great Britain’s Conservative Party returned to Number 10 Downing Street after they won the election by a narrow margin. Who became Britain’s new Prime Minister?
Fans around the world gathered in December 2010 to mark the 30th anniversary of John Lennon’s death. Where was the former Beatle killed?
Here we would focus on “win the election by a narrow margin” and “mark the anniversary’ etc.

However, recently I’ve started experimenting with decontextualised vocabulary teaching. Last year after the news round-up I gave my upper-intermediate students seven items to learn at home (Go home and look up):

go to the polls
adaptation
caught on camera
blockbuster
strain (of a virus)
pay tribute
left stranded
outbreak

The students had to study the items independently and, as a follow up, try to relate them to the news stories we had talked about in class. For instance, “go to the polls” could be related to the British election story,  “pay tribute” could be a reference to John Lennon’s anniversary, “blockbuster” and “adaptation” to various movies discussed in the lesson. Does it still count as decontextualised? I believe so, as the items were given out of context and had to be contextualised later on in the follow-up task.

What happens next
In the following lesson we reviewed the items that came up in the previous lesson and then checked the ones students had to look up at home. Overall, they liked the self-study activity; however the results of their look-ups were mixed. While “caught on camera” and “outbreak” did not pose much difficulty, “go to the polls” was interpreted by some students as “taking part in a survey” – I guess they had previously encountered “polls” as in “opinion polls”. When dealing with “strain” some students once again fell back on the previous knowledge of “strain” as “pressure” (despite the word “virus” given in brackets as a hint). One of the students misconstrued the word “adaptation” as “adoption”. Therefore further engagement with the items was necessary in order to clarify, further elaborate and, in some cases, re-teach certain chunks
            While most of my students are trained in using mono-lingual dictionaries (paper or online), some resorted to a bilingual dictionary of the Morfix variety, which do not provide collocations or examples of usage. Ironically, it was the most advanced student who went one step further and tried to make his own sentences with the given items and got almost all of them wrong.
            *Today we have to pay tribute to the passengers of Air France flight 447 that crashed…

My informal study
            A week later I decided to administer a test (aka "post-test") which involved a gapfill task without a word bank but with the first letter (sometimes first two letters) given. I wanted to see which items were learnt better: the ones taught in class (contextualised) or the ones studies at home (decontextualised). And the result was... There were no significant differences between the items which were introduced in context and the ones assigned to students to learn at home. 


Do you find the results surprising? Is context overrated? Should we go back to giving our students word lists to memorise at home? I would like to hear your thoughts before posting the conclusions I've drawn from this experiment.


To read the conclusions, click here

12 comments:

  1. Interesting experiment Leo. I am actually NOT surprised by the results. I do not think it makes a whole lot of difference WHEN the words are contextualized, rather that they ARE at some point in the process, and that the ones that eventally "stick" are the ones which have become meaningful for the student, enough to be hooked into the person's memory.

    Nice ideas! Adele

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for your comment, Adele. So you say that personalisation is what matters most. Well, I can't but agree with you. In my opinion, relevance to the learner beats contextualisation hands down and my personal experience learning other languages attests to that.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I read your blog and I love to read it you should visit my website to information about how to improve vocabulary fast. with help of vocabulary flashcards online.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Really, it's very difficult to teach vocabulary completely out of context. For that, I'm reminded of long vocab lists by alphabet that students study for TOEFL tests or the like while I lived in Seoul. What teacher, in their right mind, would ever suggest students do such a thing?

    Even giving your students those chunks without any surrounding text isn't fundamentally decontextualised, like the situation above, since you are asking them to consider how they'd fit into contexts discussed the day before. I like this idea because it gives students some autonomy and a little tackle of critical thinking.

    What might be more challenging (and further decontextualised) is giving chunks from lessons several months ago, like a term assignment. Temporal distance from learned context is proportionate to how decontextualised vocabulary is.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This interested me immensely, Leo, and I decided to do some research about the idea. I found a really interesting article by Valerie Strauss entitled "Vocabulary twist: Teaching words OUT of context" http://voices.washingtonpost.com/answer-sheet/learning/vocabulary-twist-teaching-word.html in which she describes the work of a teacher called Shannon Reed. Shannon taught 20 out-of-context words a month, doing all sorts of activities around the words, such as MC quizzes, writing sentences, strategies for remembering the words, etc. She says that she slowly but surely started to recognize the words in the pupils' writing tasks! Important, though, to note is that she uses the system TOGETHER with the accepted in-context method.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thank you for your comment, Tyson. I like your point about temporal distance. I knew it was not entirely out of context but some sticklers would only consider it contextualised if it occurs within a text where learners can infer the meaning (which they rarely do but that's beside the point for our present purposes). I remember my Spanish teacher giving us a list of 50 (!) food items with 5 different words for shrimps/prawns but the topic of the lesson was Food so was it in or out of context?

    Thank you for the link, Ora. I have to read it in more detail but from your summary it seems what she did was similar to my activity: teach out of context, then fit into context.

    ReplyDelete
  7. We'd have to agree that there are varying degrees of contextualisation...

    ReplyDelete
  8. I don't agree with you, I still believe the words you've taught independently were contextualized once you related them to another context

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hi Leo. Thanks for the thought-provoking post.

    I'd be interested in reading further on this subject of contextualization as i've often asked the same questions you pose here. I always wonder to what extent repetition and the timeline of that repetition has an impact on acquisition. With texts we often give students a preview, context and then review of key vocabulary (hence repeating 3x). Sometimes it's enough, but often there's need for just a bit more. It's that timing question that actually most interests me.

    Cheers, Brad

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hi Noor. I was aware that it might not be considered as genuinely out of context. But what is really OUT OF context then? I mean whenever you teach vocabulary out of context, the items taught will be contextualised at some stage

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thanks for stopping by, Brad
    I absolutely agree with you that preview, (con)text and review provide at least 3 exposures but our students need much more than that, anywhere between 6 and 15 by various estimates. I sometimes spend up to 50% of a lesson reviewing and recycling lexis from previous lessons and I think that it's perfectly justified; more than that it is our aim as teachers to create the right conditions for recycling and recall and aid retrieval of the lexical items taught. I am a bit more skeptical on the question of timing and wrote quite disparagingly about it in an article I wrote for the TeachingEnglish
    LEO

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...